Showing posts with label abductive. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abductive. Show all posts

Saturday, March 17, 2012

Midterm

The midterm will be held at the beginning of class on Tuesday, March 20th. It's worth 15% of your overall grade, and will cover everything we've done in class so far:
  • definitions of 'logic,' 'reasoning,' and 'argument'
  • evaluating arguments (Chapter 6)
  • types of arguments:
    -deductive (aim for certainty, are valid/invalid and sound/unsound) (Chapter 8)
    -inductive (generalizing from examples, are evaluated based how large and representative the examples in the premises are) (Chapter 7)
    -args about cause/effect (correlation vs. causation) (Chapter 7)
    -args by analogy (evaluated in terms of how similar the things compared are, and how relevant the similarities are to the conclusion being drawn) (Chapter 7)
    -abductive (inferences to the best explanation, evaluated in terms of coherence with background theories, simplicity, predictive power, falsifiability, etc.) (Chapter 12)
  • the 11 fallacies covered in class so far (Chapter 5)
Get to studying!
Philosoraptor Disapproves of This New Lazy Rival

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Murder on the Abductive Express

I think abductive reasoning is the most effective tool we have when faced with the myriad uncertain, ambiguous issues and decisions that everyday life throws our way.  Here are some links:
  • Here's a paper (pdf) that explains why I disagree with our textbook's explanation of the scientific method. It's important to consider and test multiple possible explanations rather than a single hypothesis. 
  • (NOTE: Platt uses the word "inductive" in a more general way than we do in class, to refer to any non-deductive kind of reasoning--that is, arguments that don't attempt to absolutely prove their conclusion.) 
  • I'm 75% through reading this book: Inference to the Best Explanation by Peter Lipton. 
  • Remember when I was talking about Einstein's theory of general relativity having predictive power? This is what I had in mind.  
  • Everything you ever wanted to know about William of Ockham and his famous razor.
  • Lastly, here's a dinosaur comic murder mystery.
What's the best explanation for those curtains?!?

Friday, February 24, 2012

Child Abduction

Psychologist Alison Gopnik gave a great TED talk recently on how children are natural abductive reasoners; playing and making pretend is often about coming up with and testing various hypotheses. Here's the talk:

Gopnik's book, The Philosophical Baby, is great.