Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Homework #1: Deductive Arguments

Homework assignment #1 is due at the beginning of class on Tuesday, February 7th.  It's worth 3% of your overall grade.  The assignment is to complete the worksheet I handed out in class.

If you didn't get it in class, you can download the worksheet here. Or, if you can't download it, here are the questions on the worksheet:
DIRECTIONS: Provide original examples of the following types of arguments (in premise/conclusion form), if possible. If it is not possible, explain why.

1. A valid deductive argument with one false premise.

2. An invalid deductive argument with all true premises.

3. An unsound deductive argument that is valid.

4. A sound deductive argument that is invalid.


MULTIPLE CHOICE: Circle the correct response. Only one answer choice is correct.

5. If a deductive argument is unsound, then:
a) it must be valid.
b) it must be invalid.
c) it could be valid or invalid.

6. If a deductive argument is unsound, then:
a) at least one premise must be false.
b) all the premises must be false.
c) all the premises must be true.
d) not enough info to determine.

7. If a deductive argument is unsound, then:
a) its conclusion must be false.
b) its conclusion must be true.
c) its conclusion could be true or false.
8. If a deductive argument’s conclusion is true:
a) then the argument must be valid.
b) then the argument must be invalid.
c) then the argument could be valid or invalid.

9. If a deductive argument is sound, then:
a) it must be valid.
b) it must be invalid.
c) it could be valid or invalid.

10. If a deductive argument is sound, then:
a) at least one premise must be false.
b) all the premises must be false.
c) all the premises must be true.
d) not enough info to determine.

11. If a deductive argument is sound, then:
a) its conclusion must be true.
b) its conclusion must be false.
c) its conclusion could be true or false.

12. If a deductive argument’s conclusion is false:
a) then the argument must be valid.
b) then the argument must be invalid.
c) then the argument could be valid or invalid.
Sleep Trumps All

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Extra Credit: Understanding a Long Argument

As mentioned in class, your next extra credit assignment is to read the following column by Paul Krugman in the New York Times:
Figure out Krugman's argument: what is his main point? What are his reasons supporting this main point? Summarize Krugman's argument in a clear premise/conclusion format. Hand in your formal premise/conclusion version of Krugman's article at the beginning of class on Tuesday, January 31st.

Practice Practice Practice

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Howard Sure Is a Duck

Howard the Duck is my favorite synecdoche for the 80's:

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Homework: Email Subscription

So why does this course have a blog? Well, why is anything anything?

A blog is a website that works like a journal – users write posts that are sorted by date based on when they were written. You can find important course information (like assignments, due dates, reading schedules, etc.) on this blog. I’ll also be updating the blog throughout the semester, posting interesting items related to the stuff we’re currently discussing in class. You don't have to visit the blog if you don't want to. It's just a helpful resource. I've used a blog for this course a lot, and it's seemed helpful. Hopefully it can benefit our course, too.

Since I’ll be updating the blog a lot throughout the semester, you should check it frequently. There are, however, some convenient ways to do this without simply going to the blog each day. The best way to do this is by getting an email subscription, so any new blog post I write automatically gets emailed to you. (You can also subscribe to the rss feed, if you know what that means.) To get an email subscription:

1. Go to http://2012rowanlogic.blogspot.com.

2. At the main page, enter your email address at the top of the right column (under “EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION: Enter your Email”) and click the "Subscribe me!" button.

3. This will take you to a new page. Follow the directions under #2, where it says “To help stop spam, please type the text here that you see in the image below. Visually impaired or blind users should contact support by email.” Once you type the text, click the "Subscribe me!" button again.

4. You'll then get an email regarding the blog subscription. (Check your spam folder if you haven’t received an email after a day.) You have to confirm your registration. Do so by clicking on the "Click here to activate your account" link in the email you receive.

5. This will bring you to a page that says "Your subscription is confirmed!" Now you're subscribed.

If you are unsure whether you've subscribed, ask me (609-980-8367; landis@rowan.edu). I can check who's subscribed and who hasn't.

Laptop Kitty

Saturday, January 14, 2012

Class Expectations

Logic can be a difficult subject to master. I expect each student to put in a good deal of effort on a variety of fronts.

Read the Textbook. The textbook is, in my opinion, well written and quite helpful. While I do not assign a lot of reading, what I do assign is often dense and full of many insights. This means that you may not fully understand what you read the first time you read it. Do not despair; this is common. Logic is a branch of philosophy, and philosophical writings in general are best understood upon multiple readings. You should develop the habit of reading the assigned pages a few times, including both before and after our class discussion of the relevant material.

Attend Class. While the book is informative, often time the assigned reading is only a launching point, and the key skills or concepts we’re learning during a given section goes beyond the book. If you cannot attend class on a certain day, that’s fine (and outside excused absences, you need not tell me why—frankly, I don’t care why you’re not there). But you should not make a habit of missing classes.

Participate in Class. I like to describe our classroom as a judgment-free zone. I’m not concerned with students looking perfect or seeming smart in class. In fact, effective learning involves discussing precisely the things we don’t fully understand yet. Learning is a process that involves a lot of failing: getting things wrong, figuring out where we went wrong, and trying again. A lot of class time will involve this type of (helpful) failing. This may go against how many of your classes are run. Good. I think many of the assumptions underlying our current education institution aren’t conducive to effective learning.

Class is one of the most important times to engage in helpful discussions. If something confuses you, let me know! Chances are, it confuses a lot of students. Sometimes, I think I’ve understood something I read, only to discover upon discussing it that I haven’t really understood it. Getting feedback from a group of smart people who’ve read the same thing as you is invaluable to learning. I understand that some students are shy (I was quite shy myself in college), but try not to be timid simply out of fear of looking silly or stupid.

Practice. In addition to guided discussions, class time will involve a lot of informal group work on logic problems. There will also be lots of optional extra credit assignments. These are chances to practice. We are mostly developing skills in this class, skills that cannot be picked up in five minutes. Skills take prolonged training and effort, like learning to play the piano or hitting a 90-mph fastball. Again, be OK with failing! Just try to fail better each time you practice.

Because of this, I try to measure students based on the progress they make throughout the course. A student who struggles early in the semester is not doomed to a low grade. Early struggles are merely a warning sign that more or a different kind of effort is required. On the other end of the spectrum, for a small percentage of students, getting a good grade in this class will be relatively easy. For such students, I encourage you to challenge yourself. Don’t settle for merely learning the most basic skills we’re studying. Try to develop the more advanced skills touched on throughout the course. Read the articles linked to on the course blog! Talk to me outside class! Commit yourself to taking full advantage of this class.

Care About Learning. This should be your primary goal of taking this class—not getting a good grade, or socializing, or impressing me, or whatever. While I understand that these other things are important (I care a lot about the social value of college, for instance), these should not supersede your devotion to learning.

Practice Makes Progress

Friday, January 13, 2012

Course Details

The Logic of Everyday Reasoning
Rowan University
Philosophy 09110
  Spring 2012
Section 01: Tuesdays and Thursdays, 8:00 – 9:15 a.m. in Savitz Hall, Room 217

Section 04: Tuesdays and Thursdays, 9:25 10:40 a.m. in Rowan Hall, Room 102
Instructor: Sean Landis
Email: landis@rowan.edu
Phone: 609-980-8367
Course Website: http://2012rowanlogic.blogspot.com
Office Hours: by appointment

Required Text
THiNK: Critical Thinking and Logic Skills for Everyday Life, 2nd edition, by Judith Boss
We are presented with arguments in support of all sorts of claims all the time, on topics as serious as abortion or the death penalty and as trivial as who the Phillies best player is or whether Conan is funnier than Leno. How can we tell good arguments from bad ones?

This course focuses on understanding and evaluating arguments. We’ll first learn how to identify the components and structures of arguments. We’ll then learn how to pick apart the bad reasoning found in some arguments by going over logical fallacies, which are the different ways an argument can go wrong. We’ll also discuss the limitations of our own reasoning abilities and the natural biases that throw us off.

Armed with these evaluative tools, we’ll then explore our arguments for what we believe, and revise or strengthen them based on proper reasoning. The course’s main goal is to develop a respect for arguments as an important, if not the most important, tool of inquiry and decision-making. Examining the logical evidence in support of a claim or decision is a crucial component of figuring out the truth and gaining a deep understanding of complex issues.

Straw Person is Less Sexist
Assignments
Each assignment is created carefully, and designed to both measure and improve upon specific skills that students are expected to develop throughout the semester. I try to explicitly point out the educational importance of each assignment (both below and when I assign it), but if an assignment’s value is ever unclear, let me know! I value student feedback. Sometimes complacency makes me continue using an assignment that isn’t very helpful, or sometimes I haven’t explained an assignment clarly enough.

Midterm and Final Exams: Exams are a chance to demonstrate your understanding of a wide variety of topics and skills that we’ll study throughout the semester. To this end, there will be a variety of question types on the exams. The midterm tests everything covered during the first half of the course, and will last the full period (75 minutes) on the scheduled day. The final exam is cumulative—that is, it tests everything covered throughout the whole course. The final will also last about 75 minutes, and be held during finals week.

Quizzes: Unlike the exams, quizzes will not be cumulative. Quiz #1 will test you on everything covered during the first 4 weeks of class, and quiz #2 will test you on the material we cover after the midterm. Quizzes will last 25 minutes, and be held at the beginning of the period on the scheduled day.

Short Paper: There will be a short paper (400-800 words) on understanding and evaluating an argument from a newspaper or magazine article. Due toward the end of the semester, this assignment provides you with an opportunity to demonstrate whether you have developed two of the most primary skills we’re learning this semester: the ability to understand an argument, and the ability to evaluate an argument’s logical quality.

Group Presentation: This will be a group project presented in front of the class in the middle of the semester. Each group of 3-5 students will research two fallacies and present a 10- to 15-minute oral presentation on them to the rest of the class. Groups should focus on teaching these fallacies effectively. To this end, the main criteria groups shall be graded on are their understanding of the fallacies and their ability to effectively communicate their understanding to the rest of class.

Homework: Although I usually assign a lot of optional extra credit assignments throughout the semester, there will only be three graded homework assignments. These homework assignments will be similar to the various extra credit and in-class group work assignments we do. The graded homeworks, however, will usually come at the end of a particular section, after you have had a chance to try a variety of similar logical assignments in and out of class. The expectation, then, is not that you master every skill or concept as soon as it is introduced. Rather, you should expect to struggle on the informal and extra assignments, using them as important practice for improvement. Only after a lot of practice and effort do I expect you to perform well, and only then shall I grade your performance.

Fun Thursdays: There will be three in-class graded assignments scheduled on some Thursdays during the semester. These will be a chance to more casually discuss some issues more loosely related to the class, yet more closely connected to important practical concerns of our everyday lives.

Attendance/Participation: Most of this will be based on your attendance. If you’re there every class, you’ll get full credit for your attendance grade. In addition, informal group work can impact your grade. I value your attendance, and I expect you to show up each day. I also realize, though, that we sometimes need added motivation to attend each day, and I use this grade as a small carrot to motivate you.

Extra Credit: I like giving extra credit! I’ll be giving some official extra credit assignments throughout the semester. I’ll also be offering some extra credit points more informally during class time. Remind me about this if I slack off on dishing out extra credit points.

Midterm 150 points
Final 250 points
Quizzes (2) 75 points each (150 points total)
Group Presentation 150 points
Homework 90 points total
Short Paper 100 points
Fun Tuesdays 60 points total
Attendance/Participation 50 points

Grades
A = 934-1000 total points
A- = 900-933 total points
B+ = 867-899 total points
B = 834-866 total points
B- = 800-833 total points
C+ = 767-799 total points
C = 734-766 total points
C- = 700-733 total points
D+ = 667-699 total points
D = 634-666 total points
D- = 600-633 total points
F = below 600 total points

Classroom Policies
Academic Integrity: Cheating and plagiarism (using someone else’s words or ideas in a paper or assignment without giving credit to the source) will not be tolerated in the class. Students found guilty of either will definitely fail the exam or assignment on which they plagiarize—and possibly the entire class.

Excused Absences: Make-up exams, quizzes, in-class projects, and oral reports will only be rescheduled for any excused absences. Excused absences include religious observance, official college business, and illness or injury (with a doctor’s note). An unexcused absence on the day of any assignment or test can result in a zero on that assignment or test.

Ask Me About My Bunny
Disability Accommodations: If you have special requirements let me know as soon as possible so we can make all necessary arrangements.

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Course Schedule

*This schedule is tentative and will probably change a lot*

January 17—19
Tuesday: Introduction to class | (no reading)
Thursday: Critical Thinking & Understanding Arguments| read pages 165-174

January 24—26
Tuesday: Understanding Arguments: Argument Workshop| read pages 174-184
Thursday: Evaluating Arguments | read pages 185-191

January 31—February 2
Tuesday: Deductive Args: Valid & Sound | read pages 237-247
Thursday: Deductive Args: Evaluating Validity | read pages 247-261; Homework #1 due

February 7—9
Tuesday: Inductive Arguments | read pages 200-213
Thursday: QUIZ #1; Inductive Args: Analogies & Causal Args | read pages 214-227

February 14—16
Tuesday: Inductive Args wrap-up
Thursday: Scientific Reasoning (Abductive Args) | read pages
366-383 | FUN THURSDAY #1: Proof

February 21—23
Tuesday: Scientific Arguments: Evaluation (murder mystery) | read pages 384-394
Thursday: Fallacies: Equivocation, Division, Composition | read pages 131-136

February 28—March 1
Tuesday: Fallacies: Ad Hominem, Force, Pity, Popular Appeal | pgs. 137-144; Presentations #1 & #2
Thursday: Fallacies: Ignorance, Circular, Straw Man, Red Herring | pgs. 144-150; Presentations #3 & #4; Homework #2 due

March 6—8
Tuesday: Review for Midterm Exam | (no assignment)
Thursday: MIDTERM EXAM

March 13—15: Spring Break (no class!) (woo?)
carpe diem, lazy bones

March 20—22
Tuesday: Fallacies: Authority, Dilemma, Slippery, & Naturalistic | pgs. 150-159; Presentations #5 & #6
Thursday: Cognitive Biases: Perception, Memory, Hearsay | read pages 95-102

March 27—29
Tuesday: Cognitive Biases: Confirmation Bias, Statistical Reasoning | read pages 102-113
Thursday: Cognitive Biases: I’M-SPECIAL-ism | read pages 113-117

April 3—5
Tuesday: Cognitive Biases: Social Biases | read pgs. 118-123
Thursday: Cognitive Biases: wrap-up | no reading | FUN THURSDAY #2: Counteracting Biases

April 10—12
Tuesday: QUIZ #2; Intellectual Honesty intro | read pages 1-12
Thursday: Intellectual Honesty: Charity | read pages 13-19

April 17—19
Tuesday: Intellectual Honesty: Humility, Open-Mindedness | pgs. 20-29 | FUN THURSDAY #3: Life Plan
Thursday: PAPER due; Advertising & News | read pages 309-319, 323-330

April 24—26

Tuesday: Mass Media: News, Critical Consumers | read pages 338-352
Thursday: Mass Media wrap-up; review for Final Exam | read pages 357-359 | Homework #3 due

May 1st

8:00-10:00 | Final Exam
(8:00 class)
10:15-12:15 | Final Exam (9:25 class)

Also Ur Arg Iz Unsound